Är innehållet ändamålsenligt eller skadligt?
ÄNDAMÅLSENLIGT SKADLIGT
Translate to other languages
Economy and Politics
Bakgrundsinformation
I found this on my Twitter/X account. It shows a set of claims about how various US presidents have affected the national debt. The blue circles suggest that the debt got smaller under Democratic presidents and got bigger under Republican presidents. This needs a fact check, but if it's true, it's a powerful example of political propaganda.
Vilken metod används
Respond to Audience Needs
Detta är mediepåverkan för att
If this is true, this is a good example of how facts can be used for propaganda purposes. This is not merely informative. It's also trying to persuade.
Comments
No Comments Yet
Share Your Ideas